|
ARCHIVED ENTRIES FOR
AUGUST 2008 |
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
He went into the peroration. The year
2000 was coming. A great period of celebration and joy at
being alive in America was ahead. "I see a day," he began to
say, as Martin Luther King had once said, "I have a dream."
Every orator's art which had lately worked would become Nixon's
craft. So he said "I see a day" nine times. He saw a day
when the President would be respected and "a day when every child in
this land, regardless of his background has a chance for the best
education . . . chance to go just as high as his talents will take
him." Nixon, the Socialist! "I see a day when life in
rural America attracts people to the country rather than driving
them away. . . ." Then came a day he could see of
breakthrough on problems of slums and pollution and traffic, he
could see a day when the value of the dollar would be preserved, a
day of freedom from fear in America and in the world . . . this was
the cause he asked them all to vote for. His speech was almost
done, but he took it around the rack again. "Tonight I see the
face of a child . . . Mexican, Italian, Polish . . . none of that
matters . . . he's an American child." But stripped of
opportunity, What pain in that face when the child awakes to
poverty, neglect and despair. The ghost of J. M. Barrie
stirred in Nixon's voice, stirred in the wings and on the catwalks
and in the television sets. "Let's all save Peter Pan,"
whispered the ghost. Then Nixon saw another child tonight, "He
hears a train go by. At night he dreams of faraway places
where he'd like to go . . . he is helped on his journey through life
. . . a father who had to go to work before he finished the sixth
grade . . . a gentle Quaker mother with a passionate concern for
peace . . . a great teacher . . . a remarkable football coach . . .
courageous wife . . . loyal children . . . in his chosen profession
of politics, first there were scores, then hundreds, then thousands,
and finally millions who worked for his success. And tonight
he stands before you, nominated for president of the United States.
You can see why I believe so deeply in the American dream . . . help
me make that dream come true for millions to whom it's an impossible
dream today."
Yes, Nixon was still the spirit of television.
Mass communication was still his disease--he thought he could use it
to communicate with masses.
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
And he went on to call for progress, and
reminded everyone that progress depended on order. He was of
course in these matters shameless, he had no final passion for the
incorruptible integrity of an idea; no, ideas were rather like keys
to him on which he might play a teletype to program the American
mind. And yet the American mind was scandalously bad--the best
educational system in the world had produced the most pervasive
conditioning of mind in the history of culture just as the greatest
medical civilization in history might yet produce the worst plagues.
It opened the thought that if the Lord Himself wished to save
America, who else could he possibly use for instrument by now but
Richard Nixon? Of course if the Devil wished to push America
over the edge--well, for that, Humphrey would serve as well.
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Then came a memory of James Baldwin and Diana
Sands on a show called "Night Line" where television viewers could
make a telephone call to the guests. Baldwin had received a
call from a liberal which went, "I'd like to help, and I'm asking
you how." "Don't ask me, baby," said Baldwin, "ask yourself."
"You don't understand," said the liberal, "I know something about
these matters, but it's getting confusing for me. I'm asking
you in all sincerity where you think my help could be best offered."
"Well, baby," said Baldwin, "that's your problem."
And Diana Sands, pinky extended in total delicate Black-lady
disgust, put the receiver back in the cradle. "You see," said
Baldwin, talking to Les Crane, the master of ceremonies, "I remember
what an old Negro woman told me once down South. She said,
'What the white man will someday learn is that there is no remission
of sin.' . . ."
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
[N.B.: And what was Norman Mailer's
response to this? Well, of course, it was provocative, but
you'll just have to read the book to find out. I'm not
Mailer's Apostle, unless I'm akin to the Apostle Paul who held
everyone's cloak while they stoned Stephen. Even stoned,
though, Mailer is a more interesting writer than the rice-water
commentators of today.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Anywhere but in politics the speed with which
the position had been shifted would be sign of a monumental
instability. But politics was the place where finally nobody
meant what they said--it was a world of nightmare; psychopaths
roved. The profound and searing conflicts of politicians were
like the quarrels between the girls in a brothel--they would tear
each other's hair one night, do a trick together the next.
They had no memory. They had no principles but for one--you do
not quit the house. You may kill each other but you do not
quit the house.
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
[N.B.: Marvel at the many contemporary
parallels between this short passage and the current political
scene. Note that Norman, in a pithy, earthy image, even
explains why the Democrats now loathe Lieberman--although he might
retort that the house left him, not vice versa.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
To be a delegate and stick with the loser is a
kind of life, but no delegate can face the possibility of going from
a winner to a loser; the losses are not measurable. People are
in politics to win.
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
[N.B.: So, will Clinton's delegates stick
with her? Magic-Eight-Ball Norman says, "No."]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
I want you to pick all the fruit this year and
see that nothing is wasted. There's always someone who can use
it. Don't let good things rot for want of using. You
waste life when you waste good food. Don't let things get
lost. It's bitter to lose things.
--Katherine Anne Porter from The Jilting of
Granny Weatherall collected in The Old Order
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
"you don't care about me any more, do you
baby?"
Andy kept his back turned. At first he
had enjoyed her calling him "baby." These days it made him
shiver, as if in fear. He hesitated, then a listless
determination came over him. He dug the knife harder. "A
bit. Not much. I don't know. What you feel about
me?"
"I don't know. Something. Something
or other. I've never stayed with anyone as long as I've stayed
with you."
"Me neither."
"Do you want to forget it?"
Andy shrugged. "Up to you."
"No it is not up to me."
Andy shrugged. "I don't mind going on.
See how it goes."
--Dead Babies by Martin Amis
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
FOLDING A SHIRT
Folding a shirt, a woman stands
still for a moment, to recall
warmth of flesh; her careful hands
heavy on a sleeve, recall
a gesture, or the touch of love;
she leans against the kitchen wall,
listening for a word of love,
but only finds a sound like fear
running through the rooms above.
With folded clothes she folds her fear,
but cannot put desire away,
and cannot make the silence hear.
Unwillingly she puts away
the bread, the wine, the knife,
smooths the bed where lovers lay,
while time's unhesitating knife
cuts away the living hours,
the common rituals of life.
--Denise Levertov (from New
British Poets: An Anthology)
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
August, the aureate month, draws to its blazing
close--a month of sun, if ever there was one. Gold in the
grain on the round-backed hill fields. Gold in the wood
sunflowers, and in the summer goldenrod waving plumes all through
the woodlot, trooping down the meadow to the brookside, marching in
the dust of the roadways. Gold in the wing of the wild
canaries, dipping and twittering as they flit from weed to bush, as
if invisible waves of air tossed them up and down. The orange
and yellow clover butterflies seek out the thistle, and the giant
sulphur swallowtails are in their final brood. The amber,
chaff-filled dust gilds all the splendid sunsets in cloudless,
burning skies. Long, long after the sun has set, the
sun-drenched earth gives back its heat, radiates it to the dim
stars; the moon gets up in gold; before it lifts behind the black
fields to the east I take it for a rick fire, till it rises like an
old gold coin, that thieves have clipped on one worn edge.
--An Almanac for Moderns by Donald
Culross Peattie (entry for August 31st)
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Yes, the life of politics and the life of the
myth had diverged too far. There was nothing to return them to
one another, no common danger, no cause, no desire, and, most
essentially, no hero. It was a hero America needed, a hero
central to his time, a man whose personality might suggest
contradictions and mysteries which could reach into the alienated
circuits of the underground, because only a hero can capture the
secret imagination of a people, and so be good for the vitality of
his nation; a hero embodies the fantasy and so allows each private
mind the liberty to consider its fantasy and find a way to grow.
Each mind can become more conscious of its desire and waste less
strength in hiding from itself. Roosevelt was such a hero, and
Churchill, Lenin and de Gaulle; even Hitler, to take the most odious
example of this thesis, was a hero, the hero-as-monster, embodying
what had become the monstrous fantasy of a people, but the horror
upon which the radical mind and liberal temperament foundered was
that he gave outlet to the energies of the Germans and so presented
the twentieth century with an index of how horrible had become the
secret heart of its desire. Roosevelt is of course a happier
example of the hero; from his paralytic leg to the royal elegance of
his geniality he seemed to contain the country within himself;
everyone from the meanest starving cripple to an ambitious young man
could expand into the optimism of an improving future because the
man offered an unspoken promise of a future which would be rich.
The sexual and the sex-starved, the poor, the hard-working and the
imaginative well-to-do could see themselves in the President, could
believe him to be like themselves. So a large part of the
country was able to discover its energies because not as much was
wasted in feeling that the country was a poisonous nutrient which
stifled the day.
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
America was also the country in which the
dynamic myth of the Renaissance--that every man was potentially
extraordinary--knew its most passionate persistence. Simply,
America was the land where people still believed in heroes: George
Washington; Billy the Kid; Lincoln, Jefferson; Mark Twain, Jack
London, Hemingway; Joe Louis, Dempsey, Gentleman Jim; America
believed in athletes, rum-runners, aviators; even lovers, by the
time Valentino died. It was a country which had grown by the
leap of one hero past another--is there a county in all of our
ground which does not have its legendary figure?
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Since the First World War Americans have been
leading a double life, and our history has moved on two rivers, one
visible, the other underground; there has been the history of
politics which is concrete, factual, practical an unbelievably dull
if not for the consequences of the actions of some of these men; and
there is a subterranean river of untapped, ferocious, lonely and
romantic desires, that concentration of ecstasy and violence which
is the dream life of the nation.
--Some Honorable Men by Norman Mailer
[N.B.: Some Honorable Men
collects all of Mailer's journalism (a label not meant as a slur by
me--but it certainly is if used by him (which, by the bye, is
why he will be forgotten: he denigrated his best work as somehow not
worthy of a potential novelist)) regarding his reporting of various
Democratic and Republican conventions from 1960 to 1972. The
above excerpt is from the earliest convention Mailer covered--the
1960 Democratic convention which nominated JFK. It seems to me
that many of his observations take on an eerie prescience when
compared to this year's Presidential election so please indulge me
as I offer up the bloody bits for your delectation.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
It was arranged that the Queen Mother would
meet Nostradamus with no fuss or fanfare, and he suggested he
'move about and meet Her Majesty away from the vulgar people'.
Suffering from gout, the old man walked up to the chateau to meet
the King and Queen Mother. Moving slowly with a malacca cane
in one hand and his velvet cap in the other, he was eventually
presented to the royal party. After greeting the King properly
in Latin, a long conversation ensued during which the prophet
pronounced that Charles would not predecease the Constable; this
hardly gave cause for celebration since Montmorency was already in
his seventies. Catherine gave Nostradamus 200
écus and made him a royal councillor and
king's physician.
--Catherine de Medici: Renaissance Queen of
France by Leonie Frieda
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
The Court arrived at Troyes on 23 March to an
exotic greeting by people dressed as savages and satyrs riding
goats, donkeys and 'unicorns'. The welcome was an allusion to
the French exploration of the Americas where they had founded
colonies in Florida and Brazil; indeed, Admiral de Coligny had sent
three expeditions there recently. During their stay at Troyes
Charles touched the feet of the scrofulous and washed those of
thirteen child paupers. He then served them at dinner, which
as a young boy he had seen his father do at Fontainebleau.
Catherine meanwhile did the same for thirteen mendicant women.
--Catherine de Medici: Renaissance Queen of
France by Leonie Frieda
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
On January 31 the party set out for
Fontainebleau where Catherine had ordered that each of the most
important nobles give a reception or ball. Both the Constable
and the Cardinal de Bourbon gave suppers at their lodgings, and on
Dimance Gras, Catherine threw a banquet at the dairy of
Fontainebleau which lay a little way out from the palace, near a
meadow. The courtiers dressed as shepherds or shepherdesses
for this fête champêtre,
a precursor of the Petit Trianon parties thrown by Marie Antoinette
nearly two centuries later. Everyone judged the day a huge
success; the nobles having enjoyed their little afternoon of
pastoral simplicity, albeit in February. Later in the early
evening the guests attended a comedy in the great ballroom, followed
by a ball at which 300 'beauties dressed in gold and silver cloth'
performed a specially choreographed dance. Henri of Anjou gave
his banquet the next day, after which a mock battle was held between
twelve young knights. On Mardi Gras an enchanted castle had
been built in which six maidens were held captive damsels. At
the sound of a bell, Condé led the
defenders out of the castle to fight a superb mock battle and the
scantily-clad nymphs were rescued by their gallants. The royal
children also played a role in the festivities giving a performance
of a pastorale written by Ronsard.
--Catherine de Medici: Renaissance Queen of
France by Leonie Frieda
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
One of the reasons that most literary artists
are contemptuous of Sigmund Freud--whose thought Vladimir Nabokov
once characterized as no more than private parts covered up by Greek
myths--is that his extreme determinism is felt to be immensely
untrue to the rich complexity of life, with its twists and turns and
manifold surprises.
--A Literary Education by Joseph
Epstein in New Criterion (June 2008).
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
At nineteen, I read with genuinely heated
excitement Max Weber's great essay "The Protestant Ethic and the
Spirit of Capitalism," quite blown away by the astonishing
intellectual connections made by its author. I felt my spirit
scorched reading Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents.
Weber's and Freud's are ideas to the highest power, yet they
were--and here I hope I do not sound condescending--ideas merely.
They were ideas used in the sense that T. S. Eliot used the word
when he said of Henry James that he "had a mind so fine no idea
could violate it."
--A Literary Education by Joseph
Epstein in New Criterion (June 2008).
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Almost everyone of any imagination wishes he
could do a second draft on his education. The reason for this,
I suppose, is that we are put through our education well before we
can have any grasp on what education is really about. The Duc
de Saint-Simon, the greatest writer of memoirs the world has known,
noted, with chagrin, that "I had a natural love for reading and
history. . . . I have often thought that, had they encouraged
me to make it my serious study, I might have made something of
myself."
--A Literary Education by Joseph
Epstein in New Criterion (June 2008).
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
One could laugh at day-dreams, but so long as
you had the capacity to day-dream, there was a chance that you might
develop some of the qualities of which you dreamed. It was
like the religious discipline: words however emptily repeated can in
time form a habit, a kind of unnoticed sediment at the bottom of the
mind--until one day to your own surprise you find yourself acting on
the belief you thought you didn't believe in.
--The Ministry of Fear by Graham
Greene
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
[T]heir logic chopping was a public nuisance,
found bad for the morale of the -verts (con- or per-).
--Guide to Kulchur by Ezra Pound
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Approaches governed by very general ideas tend
to bypass the individual work or author: understanding is replaced
by what W. T. Mitchell called "overstanding". The capacious
frame of reference in which the work is located--evident to the
critic but not to the author--places the former in a position of
knowing superiority vis-a-vis the latter. The work becomes a
mere example of some historical, cultural, political, or other trend
of which the author will have been dimly aware, if at all. The
differences between one author and another are also minimized.
Like hypochondriacs, theory-led critics find what they seek: so Jane
Austen and the Venerable Bede are alike in representing the hegemony
of the colonizer over the colonized, the powerful over the
powerless, or the voiced over the voiceless; or in their failure to
acknowledge the fictionality of the bourgeois fiction of the self.
The fashions have moved on. Structuralist, post-structuralist,
pychoanalytical (Freudian, Lacanian), historical materialist,
Marxist approaches look pretty dated. "Literary studies" at
the cutting edge has woken out of some of its most ambitious
appropriations, though they are still inflicted on students.
Dreams of explaining or even overthrowing Western capitalism by
unmasking its discourses of power through an embittered analysis of
Shakespeare look simply daft. The reign of Theory seems to be
over. Unfortunately the habit of approaching literature
through ideas assimilated uncritically from other disciplines, and
of examining individual works through an inverted telescope, has not
yet been kicked.
--License my roving hands by Raymond
Tallis in The Times Literary Supplement from April 11, 2008
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
For an academic, there are many reasons for
going "interdisciplinary". You can, as John Bayley once said,
"rise between two stools". Most of the time you will be
selling your product to an audience that is not in a position to
judge the correctness, the validity, or even the probable veracity
of the claims you are making about the guest discipline you exploit.
Ingenious, not to say flaky, interpretations will pass unchallenged.
A new paradigm also means lots of conferences and papers, and other
ways of enhancing the path to professional advancement. It may
also help you to overcome a crisis of confidence in the value of way
you are doing. To modify what Ernest Gellner once said, "When
a priest loses his faith, he is unfrocked, when critics lose theirs,
they redefine their subject".
--License my roving hands by Raymond
Tallis in The Times Literary Supplement from April 11, 2008
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
We are war. Because we are soldiers.
I have burned all the cities,
Strangled all the women,
Brained all the children,
Plundered all the land.
I have shot a million enemies,
Laid waste the fields, destroyed the churches,
Ravaged the souls of the inhabitants,
Spilled the blood and tears of all the mothers.
I did it, all me.--I did
Nothing. But I was a soldier.
--A Stranger to Myself by Willy Peter
Reese (tr. Michael Hofmann).
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
The was began, and we saw God and his stars
perish in the West. Death rampaged over the earth--he took off
his mask, and his skull face grinned, chiseled with dementia and
pain. We set out into no-man's-land, saw him dance in the
distance, and heard the throb of his drums at night. And so he
brought in his harvest of corn and tares.
He transformed us with his being. He
showed us other names and dimensions, and his dreams marked the
picture of our time. His shadow fell across our path.
His thoughts filled the spirit of the seeker, and sadness,
suffering, and fear sprang up from the seed he had sown.
Forced marches and dangers gave rise to
adventure, but the conversation of the angels stopped at our graves.
We, the nameless and the unknown, the solitary and the lover, the
wise man and the fool, the rich and the poor, took up the fight with
our destiny, and under the constellation of necessity, we found a
role for ourselves in resurrection and carrion. We danced
around his altar like will-o'-the wisps: the killer, the doomed man,
and the victim. We yearned to know his secrets, the purpose of
his riddles, and the meaning of his games with masks and disguises.
We talked in our sleep like dreamers, and such things as hope,
faith, and love acquired weight once more. From the hell of
storms of steel, faith in destiny, astral solitude, and out of
readiness to die, we plunged into the abyss of eternity, and at the
bottom we found God's face among the wreckage and dust of our years.
In this way, death grew into our lives.
In no-man's-land, he kept watch.
--A Stranger to Myself by Willy Peter
Reese (tr. Michael Hofmann).
[N.B.: This is the opening of a
remarkable memoir written by a German soldier, Willy Peter Reese,
serving at the Eastern Front during World War II. As mentioned
in the preface by Max Hastings, Willy was no nazi and he felt deep
regret for many of the things he did. Until, like every other
soldier in his squad, he, too, was engulfed in that most merciless
of all engagements (indeed, after the war, Stalin exiled and killed
his own troops because, by victoriously marching across Eastern
Europe, they became necessarily contaminated by the West and must
therefore be quarantined and the contagion cut out).]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
POLITICS
He wants power
He has power
He wants more
And his country will break in his hands,
Is breaking now.
--Alkaios from Pure Pagan (tr. Burton
Raffel)
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
I would stand and look out over the roofs of
Paris and think, "Do not worry. You have always written before
and you will write now. All you have to do is write one true
sentence. Write the truest sentence that you know." So
finally I would write one true sentence, and then go on from there.
It was easy then because there was always one true sentence that I
knew or had seen or had heard someone say. If I started to
write elaborately, or like someone introducing or presenting
something, I found that I could cut that scrollwork or ornament out
and throw it away and start with the first true simple declarative
sentence I had written. Up in that room I decided that I would
write one story about each thing that I knew about. I was
trying to do this all the time I was writing, and it was good and
severe discipline.
--A Moveable Feast by Ernest Hemingway
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
This is the way people speak, she thought, when
love is not a name any more but has been recognized alive in
somebody else's flesh. Because of her he walks into strange
places, stops people in the street, carries books under his arm to
implicate strangers into what they are together.
--My Next Bride by Kay Boyle
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
"Now here's a distinguished pair for you," she
tells Kate and watches her carefully; she is not paying any
attention to us. "The barbarians at the inner gate and who
defends the West? Don John of Austria? No, Mr Bolling
the stockbroker and Mr Wade the lawyer. Mr Bolling and Mr
Wade, defenders of the faith, seats of wisdom, mirrors of justice.
God, I wouldn't mind if they showed a little spirit in their
debauchery, but look at them. Rosenkranz and Guildenstern.
--The Moviegoer by Walker Percy
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
It had never occurred to him, even in his most
forgiving moods, that the reason Mary had that first love-affair was
that he made her feel so very inferior (morally, intellectually, in
every way except socially) that life with him turned into a constant
reproach. In a perverse way, it was as though he wanted her to
do it in order to show that he was the more virtuous partner.
He wanted to build up an unsurpassed knowledge of manuscripts in
order to spike the dons' guns. That was doing a good thing for
an evil purpose. But by the time of Mary's first infidelity he
had moved into the more dangerous waters of longing for an evil
thing for an entirely evil purpose. He longed for everyone to
see how patiently he, how woefully she, was behaving. The
wounded bitterness, the anger, was something that he had wanted to
express almost since he met her, to stamp upon all the good
impulses, all the natural sweetness of their love.
--Wise Virgin by A.N. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|